Skip to main content Skip to navigation
Science in action to improve the sustainability of agriculture, natural resources, and food systems
Learn More Program Areas

Boutique Biochars: Exploring Engineering Strategies to Increase Phosphate Adsorption

Posted by Karen Hills | August 10, 2020
This is part of a series highlighting work by Washington State University (WSU) researchers through the Waste to Fuels Technology Partnership between the Department of Ecology and WSU during the 2017-2019 biennium.

Biochar is produced by pyrolysis of woody (technically, lignocellulosic) materials. By controlling the conditions under which it is produced, researchers can engineer biochar to be more effective for particular purposes. In previous articles, I explored work looking at the potential for biochar to draw down atmospheric carbon dioxide and increase water holding capacity in soils. Michael Aniayia (Figure 1) and his colleagues in the lab of Dr. Manuel Garcia-Perez at Washington State University, engineered biochar for a specific purpose—adsorbing phosphate, a nutrient that, because it is also common in wastewater and manure, can pollute waterways. Aniayia’s objective was to evaluate strategies for producing biochar in order to improve its ability to remove phosphate.

Man in lab coat prepares to load sample into lab equipment.
Figure 1. Michael Ayiania is a Postdoctoral Researcher working on approaches to engineering biochars at Washington State University. Photo: R. Esquivel-Garcia.

Ayiania used and evaluated a number of strategies, each designed to change the physical or chemical makeup of the biochar to improve phosphate adsorption. He produced a first generation biochar using a pyrolysis step, followed by an activation step with carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide-activated char from anaerobically digested fiber had phosphate adsorption capacity of 32.4 mg of phosphate per gram of biochar. He also produced a second generation biochar by “nitrogen doping.” Nitrogen doping is the process of introducing nitrogen functional groups into a carbonaceous material, like biochar. Nitrogen doping increased phosphate adsorption capacity to 110.3 mg of phosphate per gram of biochar. He also evaluated third generation biochar, produced by first impregnating the feedstock with metals (magnesium, calcium, or iron) and then using the N-doping process to create a metal-N-doped biochar. The synergy between magnesium and nitrogen doping resulted in biochar with an enhanced ability to adsorb phosphate (Figure 2). Biochar produced from cellulose that was magnesium-N-doped, had a phosphate adsorption capacity of 335 mg per gram of biochar—more than ten times the adsorption capacity of the first generation biochar.

Three images of five test tubes filled with colored (A,B) and colorless (C) solution.
Figure 2. Phosphate adsorption by N-doped (A), magnesium-doped (B), and magnesium-N-doped (C) biochar derived from cellulose (pyrolyzed at 800ºC) from solutions of varying initial concentrations. Within each photo, initial phosphate concentrations increase from left to right. The color intensity is directly proportional to the remaining concentration of phosphate after treatment with equal amounts of biochar for 24 hours, with more intense yellow indicating higher concentrations of phosphate. The fact that all test tubes are colorless in (C) indicates that the magnesium-N-doped biochar was very effective at removing phosphate ions. (Source: Ayiania et al., 2019)

The bottom line is that Ayiania and colleagues were able to dramatically improve the capacity of biochar to adsorb phosphate. “Boutique biochars” like these, engineered for specific purposes, are an important specialty market for the biochar industry. From a climate change perspective, sizeable benefits will occur when  large amounts of biochar are applied to the landscape, most likely as field-scale agricultural amendments. However, demand for biochar by agricultural producers is not widespread at its current price. Developing markets for high-value biochars could help support the emerging biochar industry. If economically feasible, they could also sequester small amounts of carbon as a side-benefit to their primary use, while helping agricultural producers become more familiar with these new materials. Further technological advances in the industry and policy changes (e.g., carbon policy) could lower cost of production and spur greater adoption by agriculture in the future, leading to carbon sequestration benefits.

For more detail, see the brief project report (7 pages, Chapter 7 in Hills et al. 2019) or the longer technical report (Ayiania et al., 2019: 71 pages).

References

  • Ayiania, M., S. Haghighi Mood, Y.J. Milan, M. Garcia-Perez. 2019. Production of Engineered Biochars for Phosphate Removal from Waste Lignocellulosic Materials: First, Second, and Third Generation Engineered Products. A technical report completed as part of the Waste to Fuels Technology Partnership. 71 pp.
  • Hills, K., M. Garcia-Perez, J.E. Amonette, M. Brady, T. Jobson, D. Collins, D. Gang, E. Bronstad, M. Flury, S. Seefeldt, C.O. Stöckle, M. Ayiania, A. Berim, W. Hoashi-Erhardt, N. Khosravi, S. Haghighi Mood, R. Nelson, Y.J. Milan, N. Pickering, N. Stacey, A.H. Tanzil, J. Zhang, B. Saari, and G. Yorgey. Advancing Organics Management in Washington State: The Waste to Fuels Technology Partnership, 2017-2019 Biennium. 2019. Publication 19-07-027. Solid Waste Management Program, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.

This article is also posted on AgClimate.net.

2 thoughts on "Boutique Biochars: Exploring Engineering Strategies to Increase Phosphate Adsorption"

  1. Hello Dr. Manuel Garcia-Pérez and research team,

    Have there been or will there be tests to compare the use of this biochar in wastewater plants against methods such as ferric chloride normally used for phosphorus removal?
    I help wastewater plants to improve digester function in the service of generating biogas and eventually renewable natural gas. Phosphorus removal is one aspect of plant operation that affects digester function (sometimes very adversely), so I am on the lookout for alternatives. I would appreciate a call or email to chat briefly and see if there is traction for this idea.

    Thank you,

    Kathlyn Kinney

    1. Karen Hills says:

      Hi Kathlyn,
      Thank you for your interest in this topic. Great question. I passed your comment along to Dr. Garcia-Pérez so that he can respond to your inquiry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *