Do “Nonpecuniary Benefits of Farming” or “Psychological Ownership” affect Water Markets?

Examines whether psychological factors influence agricultural water leasing and selling decisions in Washington.

Illegible screenshot of a PDF.

This research highlight summarizes findings from an experimental study examining whether nonpecuniary benefits of farming and psychological ownership influence water market participation among Washington state water right holders. Using an incentive-compatible online field experiment, surface water right holders from the Methow, Okanogan, Walla Walla, and Yakima basins were assigned hypothetical leasing and selling scenarios. The study tested whether priming participants to think about their own land and water rights, or assigning them as owner-operators versus owner-nonoperators, affected willingness to lease or sell water rights. Results showed no statistically significant impacts of nonpecuniary benefits of farming or psychological ownership on hypothetical leasing or selling decisions. While leasing participation exceeded selling participation, psychological factors did not meaningfully alter offer prices or participation decisions. The study provides foundational insights for future research on behavioral influences in water markets.

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, project #1016467.

This publication is part of an archive and may not meet current digital accessibility standards. CSANR is working to improve digital accessibility of all materials. If you need this content in an alternative format, please contact csanr@wsu.edu.

Authors

Deol, S.

Related Products

Related Project

Suggested Citation

Deol, S., Yoder, J., Cook, J. 2024. Do “Nonpecuniary Benefits of Farming” or “Psychological Ownership” Affect Water Markets? Technology for Trade Research Highlight. Washington State University.

Year Published

2024

Area of Focus

Water Resources & Policy

Topics

Production Systems and Water Resources

Funding Source