Smart market incentives can encourage water trades that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining efficient water allocation.

This research highlight explores how water markets can be designed to achieve environmental and economic benefits simultaneously. While water markets can help reallocate scarce water resources among users, they may also create secondary impacts such as reduced instream flows, groundwater depletion, or habitat degradation. The study expands the Open Water Trade smart market algorithm to include targeted third-party incentive payments that encourage trades producing environmental benefits.
Using applications in Washington’s Yakima Basin and California’s San Joaquin Valley, the model demonstrates how small payments from an environmental buyer can influence trade patterns to increase instream flows or reduce groundwater pumping near sensitive habitats. The results show that incentive-based approaches embedded in smart market systems can mitigate environmental impacts at lower cost than direct regulatory restrictions. This approach provides a flexible policy tool for managing water scarcity while supporting ecosystem protection and water market participation.
This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, project #1016467.
This publication is part of an archive and may not meet current digital accessibility standards. CSANR is working to improve digital accessibility of all materials. If you need this content in an alternative format, please contact csanr@wsu.edu.
Authors
Ronspies, R., MacEwan, D., Howitt, R., Hatchett, S., and Cook, J.
Related Products
- Tech for Trade Water Management Survey: Summary Statistics and Documentation
- What Is the Accuracy of Seasonal Forecasts for Informing Agricultural Decisions?
- Can a Seasonal Drought Forecast Be Wrong and Still Worth Using for Making Water Leasing Decisions?
- Do Strong El Niño/La Niña Signals Translate to Higher Accuracy and Value of Seasonal Forecasts?
- Scientific Developments in Quantifying Consumptive Use and Crop Water Requirements for Washington State
- Crop Model-Data Fusion for On-Farm Estimation of Crop Evapotranspiration
- Integrating Satellite Images with Agriculture Modeling for Estimating Field Scale Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Demand
- Water Markets in Washington State: What If Leasing Part of a Water Right Was Allowed?
- Nonpecuniary Effects on Farmer Behavior: Evidence from Washington State Farmers with Surface Water Irrigation
- Do “Nonpecuniary Benefits of Farming” or “Psychological Ownership” affect Water Markets?
- Agent-Based Model Development and Touchet Watershed Data Usage
- Does the “Use It or Lose It” Doctrine Have Teeth? Evidence for Water Right Forfeiture in Washington State from 1967 to 2019
- Use It or Lose It: The Economic Consequences of Forfeiture Rules Under the Prior Appropriations Doctrine
- A Field Level Economic Model of Regional Agricultural Production
- Open Water Trade: An Open-Source Smart Market for Water
- Open Water Trade: A Water Trading Exercise Software for Education and Water Market Design
- An Agent-Based Model for Assessing Agricultural Water Market Structure and Function
- Partnering with Practitioners in Developing Improved Information Technologies for Water Management
- Water Markets’ Potential for Addressing Drought, Water Availability
- Putting a Price on Water: Would Price Disclosure Increase Water Market Participation?
- Water Markets: The Complexity of Trading Private Rights to a Public Good
- A Framework to Evaluate Irrigation Efficiency Impacts Under a Changing Climate
- Climate Change & Stream Flow for Salmon: Barriers & Opportunities for Adaptation in Washington State
- Coevolution of Technology and Law for Water Management in Washington State and Beyond
- Lessons Learned from the Listening Sessions for the Technology for Trade Project
Related Project
Suggested Citation
Ronspies, B., MacEwan, D., Howitt, R., Hatchett, S., Cook, J. 2023. Incentivizing Multibenefit Outcomes in Surface and Groundwater Markets. Technology for Trade Research Highlight. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
Year Published
2024
Areas of Focus
Agricultural Technology and Water Resources & Policy
Topics
Natural Resources, Production Systems, and Water Resources


