Turning Urban Wood Waste into Biochar

Biochar as a soil amendment has been the subject of much attention in recent years because of its ability to sequester carbon and to improve aggregation, water holding capacity, and organic matter content of soil amended with it (Lehmann, 2007; Marris, 2006). A recent article on the Ag Climate Network blog from our colleagues at Oregon State University discusses what’s needed to economically produce forest to farm biochar. In contrast, researchers at Washington State University are investigating what we could call waste to farm biochar. Waste to farm biochar, if deployed on a larger scale, could offer a two-part benefit – removal of wood from the municipal solid waste stream and creation of a valuable product from this wood. In recent work, researchers are looking at two possible wastes that could be made into biochar: wood-based fractions of municipal solid waste and the large woody material remaining after compost production—referred to as “compost overs.”

Eleven different compost overs and wood-based products
Figure 1: Images of the woody biomass sources used to create biochar for this project, including compost overs and wood-based products from municipal solid waste. (source: WTFT 2015-2017 report; photo credit: M. Ayiania)
Michael Ayiania with laboratory equipment
Figure 2. Michael Ayiania used a spoon pyrolysis reactor to create small samples of biochar from urban wood residuals. (photo credit: R. Esquivel-Garcia)

Wood-based products in municipal solid waste are extremely varied and include materials such as plywood, particle board, and furniture (Figure 1). They also include wood that has been painted or treated, which has the potential to introduce environmental pollutants that can have detrimental effects on crops and soils. Michael Ayiania, a Ph.D. student working with Dr. Manuel Garcia-Pérez in the Department of Biological Systems Engineering, has worked to characterize biochar produced from urban wood waste and compost overs and to examine potential pollutants—heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and volatile organic compounds—in biochar produced from these municipal sources.

Biochar is made through a process called pyrolysis, which is a thermal conversion in the absence of oxygen. For this project, Ayiania prepared samples by grinding and sieving them, and then used a machine called a spoon pyrolysis reactor (Figure 2), set at either 400°C or 600°C, to create small batches of biochar from each of the feedstocks (Figure 3).

Three small piles of biochar from compost overs, molded wood pallet, and particle board.
Figure 3. Biochar resulting from three forms of urban wood waste examined in this study: compost overs, molded wood pallet, and particle board. (photo credit: M. Ayiania)

Ayiania investigated the fundamental characteristics of the resulting biochar that affect its usefulness as a soil amendment: fixed carbon and ash content, surface area, and micropore volume. Fixed carbon is the fraction of biochar that can persist in the soil for thousands of years. It is desirable for biochar used to amend soil to have a high fixed carbon content. A high ash content can also benefit cropland by raising the pH of acidic soils. Surface area impacts the reactivity of biochar; the greater the surface area, the more chemical interaction with the soil per gram of biochar. Micropores (Figure 4) contribute to the surface area of biochar and affect its ability to adsorb small molecules. For all feedstocks, the biochar with the best characteristics for use as a soil amendment (high fixed carbon and ash content, surface area and micropore volume) was obtained at 600°C.

Electron microscopy images showing porous structures of biochar
Figure 4. Micropores in biochar vary based on feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature. Shown are electron microscopy images of biochar made from more typical feedstocks: Douglas fir wood, Douglas fir bark, and hybrid poplar (not included in this study). (photo credit: Waled Suliman)

The presence of metals in soil amendments can be an issue because of their tendency to build up in soil with repeated applications. In this project, potentially problematic concentrations of metals were found in painted wood (mercury) and treated wood (arsenic). Ayiania also monitored soluble organic compounds (in this case, compounds called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons – carcinogenic compounds that can be produced during pyrolysis that have a detrimental effect on soil quality and plant growth), but none were found in biochar from any of the feedstocks.

While treated and painted wood materials in this study were not suitable for use as biochar feedstocks due to metal concentrations in the resulting products, this study confirms that some wood-based fractions of municipal solid waste and compost overs can be suitable feedstocks for producing biochar as a soil amendment—waste to farm biochar—especially if produced at high temperatures.

For more information on this project and others funded through the Waste to Fuels Partnership, please see the Waste to Fuels Technology Partnership 2015-2017 Biennium Report. Read more about research underway on the Garcia-Pérez lab’s website.

This work was funded through the Waste to Fuels Technology Partnership between the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources at Washington State University and the Washington Department of Ecology’s Waste 2 Resources Program. This partnership advances targeted applied research and extension on emerging technologies for managing residual organic matter.



Ayiania, M. and M. Garcia- Pérez. Quantification of Heavy Metals and Soluble Organic Pollutants in Biochar from Pyrolysis of Urban Wood Residuals and Compost Overs. Chapter 5 in Chen, S. et. al. Advancing Organics Management in Washington State: The Waste to Fuels Technology Partnership. Waste 2 Resources, Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 18-07-010. Olympia, Washington.

Lehmann, J. 2007. A handful of carbon. Nature, 447 (7141), 143-144.

Marris, E. 2006. Putting the carbon back: Black is the new green. Nature, 442 (7103), 624-626.


This article is also posted on the Agriculture Climate Network blog.


8 comments on "Turning Urban Wood Waste into Biochar"
  1. I would like to contact the hiring director with my inquiry for clerical, administrative or research assistant positions of employment near or within city limits of Mercer Island,WA where I live. I am familiar with WSU’s extension field office in Renton and would commute to that location.

    Agriculture, Climate, Sustainable Practices, Community and Society, and Energy are all special topics of interest to me. Currently I have been employed as an Educator in local school districts in Washington State and Colorado. I look forward to a career change.

    1. Thanks for the question. Look at the report link in the post for more detail, but treated and painted wood can be problematic because of metal content.

  2. Would using treated wood be ok for non edible garden purposes? Or remediation projects? Would using treated feedstock release toxins into the atmophere?

    1. Emissions of problematic compounds into the atmosphere depends on the specifics of the compounds used to treat the wood and the biochar production process, but in general the best policy is to start with clean wood. That would be my recommendation.

  3. In areas where forest wood waste is not available, what would you recommend to use for biochar source? Would industrial pallets be useful if they do not contain any paint?

    1. Certainly untreated wood (such as pallets) can be used to produce biochar. As can agricultural residues (such as straw, orchard prunings, hop vines, etc.) where they are available. In some places, manure is used for biochar production. Keep in mind that different feedstocks will result in somewhat different biochar characteristics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *